Nov. 1st, 2012

Baa?

Nov. 1st, 2012 01:03 pm
missroserose: (Haircut)
Most of my friends have made the switch to Dreamwidth at this point. I haven't personally had too many problems with LiveJournal, but the ability to import your entire journal (along with security groups and settings), combined with the auto-crossposting function and (in theory) a working "search this journal" option, was a little too attractive to resist. So I'm joining the throng - I've got nearly a decade of history on LJ, and it never hurts to have a mirror.

Only issue so far - I haven't been able to get my comments to import from Livejournal, despite Dreamwidth telling me they imported successfully. Other DW users, any thoughts?

Anyway, things will still auto-crosspost to LJ, and I'll still be answering comments and reading my friends page there, so not a whole lot is changing. This is more of an FYI/"if you're already on Dreamwidth please add me" sort of post.
missroserose: (Balloons and Ocean)
I'm not certain I can really review the movie version of Cloud Atlas properly. I loved the book so much that I've listened to/read it multiple times in the past couple of months, so I'm already fairly familiar with the various stories it presents. However, speaking as someone who did love the book (and shared in the author's doubts that it could be adapted at all, despite having watched the glorious trailer multiple times) I can say that, even with the necessary compression of each story for film, there were only a couple of places where the movie disappointed, and those were fairly minor.

I'm amused to see it hanging on to a 55 on Metacritic; honestly, that's about what I would have predicted. Personally, I will happily admit its flaws but feel it greater than the sum of its parts; however, in order to realize the latter aspect, one has to understand its individual parts, which for those not already familiar with the story would almost certainly require repeat viewings. And, of course, if you don't connect with the film on an emotional level, you're not likely to sit through its three-hour length again just to work out the details. On that level, therefore, it's something of a binary experience; you're either going to 'get' it intuitively, or you won't. Even if you don't, though, I'd argue that it's worth at least one viewing; the pacing is masterful (it truly doesn't feel like three hours aside from the inevitable bladder pressure) and combination of its ambition and cinematic mastery are both well worth appreciation.  Just don't go in expecting it to spoon-feed you a formulaic story, as I suspect a few of the critics did.

Anyway, that's the objective review/recommendation part done with, inasmuch as there is one. Now, much as I did with another rather ambitious adaptation a few years ago, it's discussion time! Following, some fairly detailed thoughts on what worked, what didn't, where the source material was better and where it manages to supersede the original work.

My thoughts below. Spoilery, and not really very sensical if you don't know the story, anyway. )

I'm interested in other folks' thoughts, so if you've seen the movie (or read the book), please comment.  (Disagreement is allowed, I promise. :)  And if you haven't, hurry up and go see it so we can talk about it! 

Profile

missroserose: (Default)
Ambrosia

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 03:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »